Ultimately, there might be no way to extinguish the negative bias of our minds. Unable to rise above this negativity bias with praise, affirmations, magic formulas and the like, it might be time to embrace the advantage that our negative capability confers – most especially, the ability to see reality straight and, so, to adjust course and survive. In fact, studies show that depressed people may be sadder, but they are also wiser, to evoke the famous words of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. This ‘depressive realism’ gives the forlorn a more accurate perception of reality, especially in terms of their own place in the world and their ability to influence events.
I know this is a tough topic to understand and to deal with on a personal level. But it is such a barrier to belief for so many people that we have to take responsibility for knowing how to respond. Many Christians run to Genesis 3 to answer that we simply live as fallen creatures in a fallen world. While that’s true, there are a couple of reasons why we need to develop our ability to address the problem of evil beyond that quick reply.
The Bremen Incident led the Nazi’s to raise their banner of hatred as a national symbol while making the Jews into “second class subjects” of Germany. The Jews were then treated as the untermenschenHitler believed they were.
If God has created an area of crossover where evil for us is good for itself, why do we presume heaven will be any better? It could be far, far worse!
Alvin Plantinga has suggested an expanded version of the free will defense . The first part of his defense accounts for moral evil as the result of human action with free will. The second part of his defense suggests the logical possibility of "a mighty non-human spirit" (non-God supernatural beings and fallen angels)   whose free will is responsible for " natural evils ", including earthquakes, floods, and virulent diseases. Most scholars agree that Plantinga's free will of human and non-human spirits (demons) argument successfully solves the logical problem of evil, proving that God and evil are logically compatible  but other scholars explicitly dissent.  The dissenters state that while explaining infectious diseases, cancer, hurricanes and other nature-caused suffering as something that is caused by the free will of supernatural beings solves the logical version of the problem of evil, it is highly unlikely that these natural evils do not have natural causes that an omnipotent God could prevent, but instead are caused by the immoral actions of supernatural beings with free will who God created.  According to Michael Tooley, this defense is also highly implausible because suffering from natural evil is localized, rational causes and cures for major diseases have been found, and it is unclear why anyone, including a supernatural being who God created would choose to inflict localized evil and suffering to innocent children for example, and why God fails to stop such suffering if he is omnipotent. 
She . . was about to mutter her quick 'Our Father' and 'Hail Marys' while she dressed, when she remembered . . What was the good of praying now? . . she had chosen her side: if they damned him they'd got to damn her, too
Text Preview More ↓ Continue reading... Open Document